Entry 1: The Search Begins
I had puzzled over
the names on the family tree for so many months, desperately trying to get
“just one more back.” But I was never satisfied when that "one more" was revealed.
I always wanted another. And then it hit me. I had become the genealogical
equivalent of a quantitative researcher, a style that I had never embraced in
my academic career. I was merely looking to place as many names on a chart as
possible. Looking at my work, I
realized it was too numeric, too sterile. I wanted to
understand my family beyond their birth and death dates.
I yearned to know who they were, why they made the choices they did, how their
past had tumbled forward to affect my present, and would likely influence the
future of my children and grandchildren. I wanted to put my qualitative skills to work.
When
I felt the
pull to do this, it was easy to choose the person to study. Mary Ann
Simons had caused me
the most frustration as I filled in the names and dates on my
ever-growing chart. I had a handwritten family tree from the early 1900s
but as it turned out, this voice from the past gave me
the misplaced confidence that the Simons' branch would be the easiest to
place
on my family tree. It was one of the most frustrating. New names
could not be found. Moving from place to place made the family difficult
to
track. When other branches revealed themselves with so little effort on
my
part, this one continued to hide in the shadows of poverty in
mid-nineteenth
century Cornwall. But more about this later.
Perhaps
it was because I felt
familiarity with this branch of my family tree that made these ancestors
so
compelling. The family gatherings at Helen Lake and the Christmas
celebrations with the
Simons’ branch conjured up the warm fuzzy feelings of my childhood. A
faded
framed photo (above) of Mary Ann's daughter, Harriet Simons, and family
had hung in a prominent place
in my home for so long. Its gold gilded frame a stark contrast to the
forlorn faces that stood silently in front of an old black and white
farmhouse.
The picture had invited me into the family scene since it hung in my own
grandmother's house. In it, Mary Ann's grandson, Thomas “Pa” Richards,
held a large parrot, a precursor
to our oft-discussed conversation of the “pet gene” shared by so many in
today’s family.
Pa
was the only
one of my great grandparents I ever knew. Unlike his young, fresh face
in the
photo (above), my five-year-old self knew him as an old wrinkled man who
sat in a chair
and rarely moved. I visited him when I went to my grandparents’ house,
but
there were stark contrasts in that, too. He lived on their first floor,
separated by what seemed to be dark, steep steps that took my little
legs forever
to climb. I remember standing at the top, looking down, feeling fright.
While the upstairs was filled with light, sound, and the smells of my
grandmother’s baking, below Pa’s quarters seemed to be a dark,
dank smelling set of confusing rooms. By the time I knew him, those
hands that
once held the parrot and fed the many dogs he owned, were covered by
translucent, age-spotted skin. And in the unusual way touch and smell
have of
allowing us to capture moments in time, I can still feel that hand, and I
am
taken back to him when I open the china cabinet that once stood in his
home.
That musty smell transports me to the late 1950s to Superior St in Ishpeming,
Michigan.
"Pa" (Thomas Richards) Holds Me |
I will be an avid follower of your blog! Your writing is rich, vivid-beautiful. I see your mom's smile in the photo of your "Pa."
ReplyDelete